Joseph Woodruff’s eighth day blessing
During the late 19th century and early 20th century, the venue for naming and blessing children was debated by the highest councils of the Church. One practice that was consistently recognized was the blessing of children when eight days old. Wilford Woodruff recorded an interesting example of this practice in his journal while he and his wife Phebe were on a mission together in England. The blessing incorporates several practices and theological principles that are foreign to modern conceptions:
JULY 25 1845 Friday Joseph Woodruffs [1] Blessing received under the Hands of his Father Wilford Woodruff of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles while in the Arms of his Mother Phebe W. Woodruff on the eight day of his age July 25th 1845 he being born Friday morning 30 minutes past 7 oclok on the eighteenth day of July AD 1845 in Liverpool England while his Parents were on a mission from their native Country to England:
In the name of Jesus Christ, and by virtue of the Holy Priesthood & the keys of the Kingdom of God I lay my hands upon thy head & anoint thee with Holy Consecrated oil which has been Consecrated under the hands of the Quorum of the Twelve apostles [2]. With this Anointing I seal thy name upon thy head which is JOSEPH. For thou art out of the Loins of Ancient Joseph sold into Egypt through the linage of Ephraim.
Thou hast a legal right to the Melchezedec Priesthood by linage. Thou art the first fruits of the Priesthood unto thy parents since there endowment [3]. Thou art a gift from God unto thy Parents in answer to their Prayers. I bless you with the blessings of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and Joseph, Ephraim & Manassah and the blessings of the new & Everlasting Covenant the blessings of heaven & the blessings of the Earth. I seal thee against the power of Death sickness & the destroyer untill thy work is finished /for thou shalt have power over them/.
I here by dedicate and Consecrate thee unto God and the Priesthood from this time forth and forever. Thou shalt live to honor thy Parents & the Priesthood. Thou shalt lay thy hands upon the heads of thy Father and Mother in their old age and bless them & thou shalt be a Comfort unto them. Thou shalt be Baptized the day thou art eight years of age so that thy Covenant with God & his kingdom shall not be broaken during thy life.
I ordain the to be a High Priest after the order of Melchisedic in the Church and kingdom of God and I seal upon thy head all the powers and blessings of this Priesthood that when thou shalt arive to years of accountability & discretion thou shalt have power to administer in the ordinances thereof.
Thou shalt follow the footsteps of thy Father in thy day and generation in the linage of the priesthood. Thou shalt have posterity who shall honor their fathers.
I seal thee in the covenant of thy father that in the morning of the first resurrection thou shalt take thy station in the celestial kingdom in the linage of thy Fathers in the family organization of the celestial world. I seal thee up unto Eternal life and no man shall take thy Crown. I seal all these blessings upon thy head in the name of Jesus Christ & by virtue of the holy Priesthood And Apos-tleship and Keys of the kingdom of God. Even so Amen. Thou shalt have thine inheritance with the tribe of Ephriam in the land of Joseph which is the land of Zion both for time and Eternity. (Wilford Woodruff’s Journal (ed. Kenny) vol. 2, pg. 584-586)
___________
- Joseph died on the 12th of November 1846 in Winter Quarters (ibid. vol. 3, pg. 95):
NOV 12th 1846 {JOSEPH} We found our little boy was failing and Could not possibly hold out longer. Evry exhertion had been made to make him comfortable And if possible to restore him to health but it seemed that He must go. He continued to fail through the day and night. Sister Abbot took the main Charge of him during the night as Mrs Woodruff Strength was mostly exhausted. He had suffered much from convulsions during his sickness but He breathed his last and fell asleep this morning 15 minuts before 6 oclok. And we took his remains to the grave at 4 oclok in the afternoon. We truly felt that we were called to make a great sacrifice in the loss of our son Joseph. [ ] I met in the council of {50} part of the day.
- The 19th century Saints were known to hold in particular value oil which had been consecrated by Church authorities. Wilford himself kept oil from his Kirtland endowment for latter use (ibid. vol. 1, pg. 306). This is the only instance that I am aware of that a child was anointed during his baby blessing from this period. Wilford also anointed his wife for burial the day she died (ibid. vol. 8, pg. 342).
- There is significant evidence that birth order after temple blessings had great significance for the early saints. See here.
One thing that stands out is that most fathers ministering in the priesthood lack authority to pronounce many of the blessings which Elder Woodruff did, such as lineage and ordination as high priest. Maybe if apostles were still getting children, their babies’ blessing would be like this one?
Comment by John Mansfield — 9/12/2006 @ 1:55 pm
That is a good point, John. In many ways this is like a patriarchal blessing (e.g., my patriach used the verb “to seal”); but even then, very few in the Church have the authority to seal people up into eternal life.
The ordination was interesting, eh? For some reason I was reminded how Joseph instructed Wilford in Nauvoo to be re-baptized then ordained a Deacon, Priest, Elder, Seventy (two different quorums), High Priest and Apostle
Comment by J. Stapley — 9/12/2006 @ 2:09 pm
Interesting post, J. Does the principle of the right to preside by lineage still function in today’s church?
FWIW, while thinking about this subject, I came across an article in the July 1906 Improvement Era quoting the text of a baby blessing given to Solomon F. Kimball by Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, and others in February 1847. It’s quite restrained in comparison to the one given to Joseph Woodruff.
Also FWIW, On the Potter’s Wheel contains the text of a brief blessing given to Brigham Willard Kimball by Brigham Young. I think it may also contain a quote from Brigham Young’s blessing(?) of Brigham Heber Young (it may have been a revelation).
Comment by Justin — 9/13/2006 @ 10:15 am
That is a great question, Justin, and my opinion is that the Church is doing its best to get away from presidency by lineage. It has been a very long time since the Church has spoken about what it means to be born in the covenant or sealed into it in terms of priesthood heritage. The Church Patriarch is done and Hinckley denies being involved in the selection of his son as a General Authority. It seems that we are trying to go from Kingdom to egalitan spiritual meritocracy.
That said, Mormon cosmology is dramatically changed when these principles are excised, and we loose something, I think…but perhaps we gain as well.
Thanks for including that blessing. I found a couple similar blessings in Woodruff’s diary after I got the post up. I think that Joseph’s blessing was perhaps so extravagent because, as Wilford states it, Joseph was “the first fruits of the Priesthood unto [his] parents since there endowment.” But, I will be interested in finding more examples and look forward to looking up those examples that you mention.
Comment by J. Stapley — 9/13/2006 @ 10:38 am
I suppose this 8th day blessing practice was patterned after Jewish circumcision on the 8th day.
I wonder whether he was actually baptized on the very day he turned 8, as directed in the blessing?
Comment by Kevin Barney — 9/13/2006 @ 12:00 pm
I think you are right, Kevin, and interestingly, Justin once pointed out how Heber C. Kimball direct circumcisions to be performed at the endowment house.
Sadly, He died when he was one year old.
Comment by J. Stapley — 9/13/2006 @ 12:07 pm
I found it interesting that the blessing was given while the child was “in the arms of his mother”.
I for one would like to a return to this practice. I understand that for baby blessings done in the home this practice can still be followed, but not for babies blessed at Church. Can anyone confirm or clarify this?
Comment by Talon — 9/15/2006 @ 2:04 pm
Consider it confirmed.
Comment by J. Stapley — 9/15/2006 @ 2:34 pm
very interesting
Comment by joseph m woodruff — 4/1/2009 @ 6:53 pm